GSHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 16.06%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Brown & Brown, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.58%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.82, signalling upside risk potential of 79.57%. On the other hand Brown & Brown, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $84.36 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Brown & Brown, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.465% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown & Brown, Inc. has a beta of 0.793, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.679%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brown & Brown, Inc. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc. pays out 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are smaller than Brown & Brown, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is lower than Brown & Brown, Inc.'s net income of $268M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.99x while Brown & Brown, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 4.98x versus 3.54x for Brown & Brown, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of -8.28%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.3%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.82, signalling upside risk potential of 79.57%. On the other hand Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.38 which suggests that it could grow by 96.32%. Given that Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, Inc., analysts believe Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance, Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.465% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.344%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are smaller than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $365.4M. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is higher than Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.99x while Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 4.98x versus 0.77x for Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a net margin of 14.03% compared to Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net margin of 21.42%. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s return on equity of 228.38% beat Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 38.25%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $89.82, signalling upside risk potential of 79.57%. On the other hand Kingstone Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.23%. Given that Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kingstone Cos., Inc., analysts believe Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is more attractive than Kingstone Cos., Inc..

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.465% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.612%.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingstone Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $90.4M, which are larger than Kingstone Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.8M. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s net income of $12.7M is higher than Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s net income of $10.9M. Notably, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.99x while Kingstone Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goosehead Insurance, Inc. is 4.98x versus 1.26x for Kingstone Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.